Skip to main content

Oregon State Flag An official website of the State of Oregon »

Step 6: Financially Constrained Funding Forecast

The TPR requires cities and counties in metropolitan areas to include a financially constrained project list in their TSP. The total cost of the constrained list must be within 125% of anticipated funding for the planning horizon and include projects sponsored by other agencies that fall within the planning area. Cities and counties must coordinate with nearby and overlapping jurisdictions to identify financial responsibility and available funding for projects within their planning boundaries, regardless of who has permitting authority. 

The following sections describe funding sources that should be considered, the process to estimate the financial forecast for the financially constrained plan, and the necessary regional coordination to confirm the forecast.

Funding Sources

Agencies should include all funding sources they anticipate using during the planning horizon to operate, maintain, improve, or construct the transportation system within the planning area. Potential sources include local, regional, state, and federal funding sources that are reasonably likely to continue in the future with consideration for their limitations or explicit purposes. These include but are not limited to the following:

  • Local and regional funds can include local taxes, bonds, fees, and grants or any other past funds.
  • State and federal funds can include funds based on factors such as population, road mileage, or usage and funds that are grants to the state and local jurisdictions (commonly referred to as formula funds).
  • Other local revenues include those from tolls or other revenue-generating facilities.
  • Funding for transit operations and capital projects. Consider district funds, biennial grant funds, and Statewide Transportation Improvement Funds.

Developing the Financial Forecast

For the funding sources identified, cities and counties must estimate the amount of funding expected to be available from each identified funding source based on reasonable assumptions for growth or changes in the funding amount and allocations to or within the study area.

The MPO's Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) can serve as the foundation for estimating federal and state funds and can help ensure the TSP aligns with the level of fiscal constraint in the RTP. Cities and counties should review the RTP and other planning documents and coordinate with ODOT and other facility owners when forecasting funding and identifying projects with funding commitments. After forecasting their own transportation funding, cities and counties should subtract the funding committed by the local agency toward projects in the RTP and the funds needed for operations and maintenance. The remainder can be used for the rest of the agency's projects.

The steps to develop the funding forecast include:

  1. Review the RTP to estimate federal, state, and regional funding for the region, identify projects on facilities owned by others (constrained and unconstrained), document assumed transit service levels, inform estimates of funding available from non-local sources for projects on local facilities, and identify if any local funding has been committed to projects on facilities owned by others. Using this information, the local TSP should describe the regional funding picture, identify constrained and unconstrained projects on facilities owned by others, and verify the approach at the ODOT Region level for assumptions about federal and state grants and how those are allocated into the financially constrained plan.
     Collaborating on Regional Forecasting in the Portland Metro area
  1. Coordinate with ODOT and other facility owners within the planning area to confirm funding assumptions, financially constrained projects on facilities owned by others, commitments by the local agency to help fund these projects, and planned future transit service coverage and service levels. Consider projects in the MPO's RTP, TSPs from neighboring jurisdictions that may have shared projects, transit development plans, Statewide Transportation Improvement Fund (STIF) Plans, the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). The STIP and MTIP can help identify projects on state and some local facilities with a dedicated funding source.
  2. Forecast local funds by funding source (such as local gas taxes, fees, property taxes, general fund allocations, and system development charges). Base the forecast on reasonable growth assumptions that are consistent with state and regional forecasts.
     Developing Growth Assumptions
  1. Identify the funding needed to operate and maintain the transportation system or funding used for purposes other than development of transportation projects, and remove this amount from the funding projection for the financially constrained project list.
  2. Identify the funding committed by the local agency for projects for sponsored projects in the RTP (the local agency's projects and those owned by others). This amount should be subtracted from the financial forecast to identify the remainder that can be used for the rest of the agency's projects.

 In addition to projects, cities and counties may also set aside funds to support programs and specific types of infrastructure improvements and to take advantage of opportunities as they arise. These may include maintenance, safe routes to school, transportation options, safety or matching funds. The TSP should identify how these set-asides fit within the prioritization framework and are consistent with achieving TSP objectives. The TSP should also provide guidance on how projects within the programs will be prioritized. This guidance should be consistent with the prioritization process applied in the TSP for each mode.

Funding Forecast Examples

  • The City of Medford TSP, pages 55-57, provides an example of forecasting revenue sources, documenting O&M costs, and estimating the amount of projected funds available for capital projects.
  • The City of Veneta TSP, pages 49-51, provides an overview of how the financial constraints were established.
  • The City of Eugene TSP, pages 79-87, provides an example of coordinating funding projections between the MPO, RTP, and local TSP.
  • The City of Hillsboro TSP Financing Plan Memo forecasts a variety of local funding mechanisms. The TSP Financing Plan Chapter connects projects to likely funding sources, including projects likely to be funded by private development. It also includes funding dedicated to citywide programs and to O&M.

Resources

  We want to hear from you!Submit TSP Guidelines Feedback
Close Close